A VERY REAL NEW WORLD ORDER
(매우 실제적인 New World Order <신세계질서>)
By Chuck Baldwin
January 27, 2009
NewsWithViews.com
It is hard to believe, but a majority of Americans (including Christians and conservatives) seem oblivious to the fact that there is a very real, very legitimate New World Order (NWO) unfolding. In the face of overwhelming evidence, most Americans not only seem totally unaware of this reality, they seem unwilling to even remotely entertain the notion.
믿기 어려우시겠지만 미국인 대부분(기독교인들과 보수주의자들)이 매우 실제적이고 아주 합법적인 New World Order(NWO)가 존재한다는 사실을 알지 못합니다. 압도적인 증거의 직면에 있어서도 대부분의 미국인들은 완전히 이 현실은 자각하지 못하는 듯이 보이는 것만이 아니라 그 관념을 멀리서나마 환대하는 것을 내켜하지 않는 듯 보입니다.
On one hand, it is understandable that so many Americans would be ignorant of the emerging New World Order. After all, the mainstream media refuses to report, or even acknowledge, the NWO. Even "conservative" commentators and talk show hosts such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, or Joe Scarborough refuse to discuss it. And when listeners call these respective programs, these "conservative" hosts usually resort to insulting the caller as being some kind of "conspiracy kook." One host even railed that if anyone questions the government line on 9/11, we should "lock them up and throw away the key." So much for freedom of speech!
한편으론, 아주 많은 미국인들이 New World Order(NWO)가 나타나는 것을 모르고 있는 듯 하다는 것을 이해 할 만 합니다. 주요 방송에서 NWO를 보도하거나 인정하는 것을 거절하고 있습니다.
더욱 보수주의자 해설자들과 토크 쇼 진행자인 러쉬 림바우프(Rush Limbaugh), 신 해니티(Sean Hannity), 미가엘 세비지(Michael Savage), or 조 스컬버로프(Joe Scarborough)와 같은 이들은 그것에 대하여 논하기를 거절하고 있습니다.
청취자가 이 프로그램에 전화를 걸면, 그러한 보수적인 진행자들은 전화를 건 사람들을 음모를 꾸미고 있는 괴짜로 인식해 보통 전화를 거절해 버립니다. 어떤 진행자는 만일 9/11에 정조준하여 정부에 대한 질문을 하면 "우리는 저런자들은 가둬버리고 키를 던져버려야 한다"고 폭언을 해 버립니다.
This is an area--perhaps the central area--where liberals and conservatives agree: they both show no patience or tolerance for anyone who believes that global government (in any form) is evolving. One has to wonder how otherwise intelligent and thoughtful people can be so brain dead when it comes to this issue. It makes one wonder who is really pulling their strings, doesn't it?
이것이 자유와 보수주의자들이 동의하는 영역입니다: 그들 모두는 세계 정부가 진화하고 있다는 것을 믿는 사람들에 대하여 인내심이나 아량이 없어 보입니다. 어떤이는 이런 이슈가 거론 될 때 어떻게 그런 지적이고 생각있는 사람들이 그렇게 생각없이 그럴 수 있느냐고 놀라워 합니다.
The list of notable personalities who have openly referenced or called for some kind of global government or New World Order is extremely lengthy. Are all these people "kooks" or "conspiracy nuts"? Why would world leaders--including presidents, secretaries of state, and high government officials; including the media, financial, and political elite--constantly refer to something that doesn't exist? Why would they write about, talk about, or openly promote a New World Order, if there is no such thing?
세계 정부나 New World Order의 종류에 대하여 인용하거나 자주 언급했던 주목할 만한 인물은 대단히 많습니다.
이러한 사람 모두가 "괴짜들"이거나 "음모 땅콩들"일까요? 왜 세계 지도자들 --대통령과 장관들, 그리고 정부 요인들( 방송, 재정, 정치분야의 엘리트들인)을 포함하여-- 끊임없이 존재하지 않는 어떤 것을 언급하곤 할까요?
만일 그러한 것이 없다면, 왜 그들이 그것에 관하여 쓰고, 말하고, New World Order를 언급할까요?
Many of us recall President George Herbert Walker Bush talking much about an emerging New World Order. For example, in 1989, Bush told the students of Texas A&M University, "Perhaps the world order of the future will truly be a family of nations."
Later, Bush, Sr. said, "We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order . . .. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders."
Bush, Sr. also said, "What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea--a new world order."
Bush, Sr. further said, "The world can therefore seize the opportunity to fulfill the long-held promise of a new world order . . ."
우리들중에 많은 이들은 등장하고 있는 New World Order에 관하여 많은 말을 했던 대통령 조지 헐벌트 월컬 부시(George Herbert Walker Bush)를 상기하실 것입니다. 예를 들면, 1989년 부시는 텍사스 A&M대학(A&M University)의 학생들에게 "아마도 미래의 세계 질서(the world order )는 진실로 국제 가족이 될 것입니다"라고 말했습니다.
후에 부시는 "우리는 새 세계 질서인 미래 세대를 위해 그리고 우리 자신을 위하여 단련하기 위하여 우리 앞에 기회를 가지고 있습니다....우리가 성공적일 때, 그리고 우리는 성공 할 것입니다, 우리는 이 New World Older를 이루기 위하여 신뢰할 수 있는 연합된 국가들이 U.N. 설립자들의 비전과 약속을 실행할 수 있도록 그것의 평화를 지키는 역할을 이용할 수 있는 질서의 실제적인 기회를 맞고 있습니다.
부시는 또한 "경계에 있다는 것은 작은 나라 이상의 것입니다, 그것은 New World Order라는 큰 이상입니다." 부시는 " 그래서 그 세상은 새로운 세계 질서의 오랫동안 유지했던 약속을 실행하기 위한 기회를 붙잡을 수 있습니다"라고 말했습니다.
What was President G.H.W. Bush talking about, if there is no such thing as an emerging New World Order? Was he talking out of his mind? Was he hallucinating?
England's Prime Minister, Tony Blair, said, "We are all internationalists now, whether we like it or not." He continued saying, "On the eve of a new Millennium we are now in a new world. We need new rules for international co-operation and new ways of organizing our international institutions." He also said, "Today the impulse towards interdependence is immeasurably greater. We are witnessing the beginnings of a new doctrine of international community."
만일 등장하고 있는 New World Order의 그러한 것이 없다면, 대통령 G.H.W. Bush는 무엇에 관하여 말하고 있는 것입니까? 그는 제정신으로 말하고 있는 것이 아닙니까? 그는 환각상태입니까? 영국 수상, 토니 블레어는 "우리는 우리가 좋아하든 좋아하지 않든, 모두 국제주의자들 입니다."
그는 계속해서 "새로운 시대의 이브에 있어서 우리는 지금 새로운 세계안에 있습니다. 우리는 국제적인 공조를 위하여, 그리고 우리의 국제적인 조직을 구성하기위한 새로운 방법들을 위하여 새로운 규범들이 필요합니다."말했고 이어서 그는 "오늘날 상호의존을 향한 추진은 헤아릴 수 없는 위대한 일입니다.
우리는 국제적인 공동체의 새로운 신조의 태동에 증인입니다."라고 말했습니다.
In 1999, Tony Blair said, "Globalization has transformed our economies and our working practices. But globalism is not just economic. It is also a political and security phenomenon."
What is Tony Blair talking about, if there is no emerging New World Order? What does he mean by "a new doctrine of international community"? What does he mean by "new world"? How can one have globalism, which includes "a political and security phenomenon," without creating a New World Order? Is Tony Blair hallucinating?
Likewise, former President George W. Bush penned his signature to the Declaration of Quebec back on April 22, 2001, in which he gave a "commitment to hemispheric integration and national and collective responsibility for improving the economic well-being and security of our people."
1999년, 토니 블레어는 "지구화는 우리의 경제와 우리의 직무를 변화시켜왔습니다. 하지만 지구화주의는 단지 경제만을 말하는 것이 아니며 정치적인 것과 보안과 관련된 것입니다"라고 말했습니다.
만일 그것이 일어나고 있는 New World Order가 아니라면, 토니 블레어가 말하고 있는 것이 무엇입니까? 그가 의미하고 있는 것이 국제 공동체의 새로운 교리입니까? 그가 말하는 "New World"는 무엇입니까?
Advertisement
By "our people," Bush meant the people of the Western Hemisphere, not the people of the United States. Phyllis Schlafly rightly reminded us that G.W. Bush "pledged that the United States will 'build a hemispheric family on the basis of a more just and democratic international order.'"
Remember, too, that it was G.W. Bush who, back in 2005, committed the United States to the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), which is nothing more than a precursor to the North American Community or Union, as outlined in CFR member Robert Pastor's manual, "Toward a North American Community."
If there is no such thing as an emerging New World Order, what was G.W. Bush talking about when he referred to "a hemispheric family" and an "international order"?
The public statements of notable world leaders regarding an emerging New World Order are copious. Consider the statements of former CBS newsman, Walter Cronkite.
In his book, "A Reporter's Life," Walter Cronkite said, "A system of world order--preferably a system of world government--is mandatory. The proud nations someday will see the light and, for the common good and their own survival, yield up their precious sovereignty . . ." Cronkite told BBC newsman Tim Sebastian, "I think we are realizing that we are going to have to have an international rule of law." He added, "We need not only an executive to make international law, but we need the military forces to enforce that law." Cronkite also said, "American people are going to begin to realize that perhaps they are going to have to yield some sovereignty to an international body to enforce world law."
If there is no emerging New World Order, what is Walter Cronkite talking about? Can there be any doubt that Cronkite is talking about global government? Absolutely not!
Now, when Bush, Sr. talks about fulfilling "the promise and vision of the U.N.'s founders," he was talking about the same thing former UN Secretary-General Boutros Boutros-Ghali was talking about when he said, "The time for absolute and exclusive sovereignty . . . has passed."
The United Nations has been on the forefront of promoting the New World Order agenda since its very inception. In 1995, the UN released a manual entitled, "Our Global Neighborhood." It states, "Population, consumption, technology, development, and the environment are linked in complex relationships that bear closely on human welfare in the global neighborhood. Their effective and equitable management calls for a systematic, long-term, global approach guided by the principle of sustainable development, which has been the central lesson from the mounting ecological dangers of recent times. Its universal application is a priority among the tasks of global governance."
If there is no emerging New World Order, what is "global governance" all about?
"Who are the movers and shakers promoting global government?" you ask. Obviously, it is the international bankers who are the heavyweights behind the push for global government. Remember, one cannot create a "global economy" without a global government to manage, oversee, and control it.
In a letter written to Colonel E. Mandell House, President Franklin D. Roosevelt said, "The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know, that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson."
"Old Hickory" did his best to rid the United States from the death grip that the international bankers were beginning to exert on this country. He may have been the last President to actually oppose the bankers. In discussing the Bank Renewal bill with a delegation of bankers in 1832, Jackson said, "Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time, and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the eternal God, I will rout you out."
Unfortunately, the international bankers proved themselves to be too formidable for President Jackson. And in 1913, with the collaboration of President Woodrow Wilson, the bankers were given charge over America's financial system by the creation of the Federal Reserve.
Ever since the CFR and Trilateral Commission were created, they have filled the key leadership positions of government, big media, and of course, the Federal Reserve.
In his book, "With No Apologies," former Republican Presidential nominee Barry Goldwater wrote, "The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power-- political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future." Was Goldwater a prophet or what?
Advertisement
And again, the goals of the global elite have been publicly stated. Back in 1991, the founder of the CFR, David Rockefeller praised the major media for their complicity in helping to facilitate the globalist agenda by saying, "We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. . . . It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
How could Rockefeller be any plainer? He acknowledged the willful assistance of the major media in helping to keep the elitists' agenda of global government from the American people. To this day, the major media has not deviated from that collaboration. And this includes the aforementioned "conservative" talking heads. They know if they want to keep their jobs, they dare not reveal the New World Order. The NWO, more than anything else, is the "Third Rail" to the national media.
Is it any wonder that President Barack Obama has stacked his government with numerous members of the CFR? Among these are Robert Gates, Janet Napolitano, Eric Shinseki, Timothy Geithner, and Tom Daschle. Other CFR members include CFR President Richard Haass, CFR Director Richard Holbrooke, and founding member of the Trilateral Commission and CFR member Paul Volcker. Obama even asked a CFR member, Rick Warren, to deliver the inaugural prayer.
Still not convinced? Just a few days ago, when asked by a reporter what he thought the most important thing was that Barack Obama could accomplish, former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger said, "I think his task will be develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a New World Order can be created. It's a great opportunity; it isn't just a crisis."
This is the same Henry Kissinger, you will recall, who said back in 1991, "Today, America would be outraged if UN troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow, they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were [sic] an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."
Even Gideon Rachman, the chief foreign affairs commentator for the Financial Times, wrote an editorial expressing his support for world government. In his column he said, "I have never believed that there is a secret United Nations plot to take over the US. . . . But, for the first time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is plausible.
"A 'world government' would involve much more than co-operation between nations. It would be an entity with state-like characteristics, backed by a body of laws. The European Union has already set up a continental government for 27 countries, which could be a model. The EU has a supreme court, a currency, thousands of pages of law, a large civil service and the ability to deploy military force.
"So could the European model go global? There are three reasons for thinking that it might."
Rachman then goes on to explain the reasons why he believes world government is plausible.
Do you now see why it does not matter to a tinker's dam whether it is a Republican or Democrat who resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue? For the most part, both major parties in Washington, D.C., have been under the dominating influence of the international bankers who control the Federal Reserve, the CFR, and the Trilateral Commission. And this is also why it does not matter whether one calls himself conservative or liberal. For the most part, both conservatives and liberals in Washington, D.C., are facilitating the emerging New World Order. It is time we wake up to this reality.
Presidents Bush, Sr., Bill Clinton, and Bush, Jr. have thoroughly set the table for the implementation of the NWO, as surely as the sun rises in the east. All Obama has to do is put the food on the table--and you can count on this: Barack Obama will serve up a New World Order feast like you cannot believe!
That a New World Order is emerging is not in question. The only question is, What will freedom-loving Americans do about it? Of course, the first thing they have to do is admit that an emerging New World Order exists! Until conservatives, Christians, pastors, constitutionalists, and others who care about a sovereign, independent United States acknowledge the reality of an emerging New World Order, they will be incapable of opposing it. And right now, that is exactly what they are not doing.
*If you appreciate this column and want to help me distribute these editorial opinions to an ever-growing audience, donations may now be made by credit card, check, or Money Order. Use this link.
© 2009 Chuck Baldwin - All Rights Reserved